JUSTICE INITIATIVE - FORENSIC INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATIONS
Fabricated Induced Illness - Truth V Myth
The Justice Initiative will conduct pre-matter and post-matter casework applying medical forensic analysis and investigative health and educational research on behalf of those parents who find themselves or have found themselves in Social Services Child Protection matters for emotional abuse and neglect or in the Family Courts accused of harming their children, who assert that they have been wrongfully founded to have committed harm. The Justice Initiative will provide free and impartial investigative and forensic analysis (Reports) as well as access to a pool of Pro Bono Medical, Scientific, Clinical, Therapeutic, Psychological, Educational, Legal, Social Care and Retired Authority Specialists who will collaborate to challenge continuing systemic failings within the applied sectors for the prevention of harm.
Fii-CHILD PROTECTION-paEdiatrics, FAMILY COURT & 'HARM'
Safeguarding and protecting a child is everyone's 'business'.
The traditional proverb, "It takes a Village", originates from the Bantu Language or from the ethnolinguistic grouping of the Bantu People in (Africa) - a grouping of some 500-700 languages that apply this proverb to raising, protecting and keeping safe their children. [There is no clear etymology.]
Nevertheless, the proverb is pertinent here; Janet Willicott is African by birth and understands Ubuntu's true and holistic value. Ubuntu is also of Bantu origin and coined/first used in ca. 1846 [Hare, H.H. et al.], meaning:
'Human Quality' - more modern usage is referred to as the ability to relate to each other [Goodness Ncube] or "A person is a person through other people", or "One’s humanity is recognised through recognition of an "other" that is despite their uniqueness and difference."
[Michael Onyebuchi Eze].
Children, Young People, The Disabled, The Infirm, The Vulnerable, The Minorites and those with a variety of complex and perplexing health needs - all need support, and all need the village to support them. Yet, they are 'unintentionally' forgotten about in favour of 'we see no issue' - therefore, the issues do not exist.
We all make mistakes, and to 'err is human' - [Pope, 1711] - So why do Medical, Clinical, Psychological, Therapeutic and Educational Professionals err? Or why are these Professionals erring so frequently, and why is Fii on the rise?
Paediatricians, especially those who are 'designated community safeguarding leads' / Social Workers, GPs/ Police, SENDCo's and the very few honorary specialists, all purport to know and understand the theory. Yet, not no one has ever challenged them and or the theory/origin of Fii.
"The Institute of Medicine report ‘To Err is Human’, health services and agencies around the world have increasingly focused on improving the safety and quality of health care. Historically, the commitment by health care professionals to ‘First do no Harm' has produced a focus on the absence of interventions that may cause adverse outcomes.
This clinical approach links to the Hippocratic Oath, which includes the promise "to abstain from doing harm". The Oath reminds clinicians to first consider the possible harm that any intervention might do. This approach to interactions with patients leads to an emphasis on the ‘absence of harm’ rather than a focus on the ‘creation of health’.
To improve the care of patients, a paradigm shift is required in the health care services from a ‘disease-based intervention’ model to a supportive ‘health’ model. Just as ‘health’ is not the absence of illness or disease, preventing patient harm is not simply avoiding interventions. To ‘first do no harm’ health services need to actively improve their focus on health and the entire patient experience." [Karen Luxford - Clinical Excellence Commission]
So, if Professionals are to improve or focus on the entire patient experience, why do they fail?
Why are Parents (Women, Mothers), Carers and Grandparents, those from Domestic Violence pasts and or the LGBTQ+ community, or those who 'think' - accused of harming their children by allegedly having Fii aka (Erroneous Beliefs) (ASD) (Rigid Thinking) (Being Dr Google) (Being too Disabled) (Medically Seeking) (Inventing Illness) (Fabricating Symptoms) (Wanting to Home Educate Children) (Not 'forcing' children into attending School enough)?
Were only one of these ('criteria'' flags) to 'pop up' a few times. All it takes is one 'professional' to determine a possible Fii matter - a s.47 is enacted upon (Child Protection) with possible s.37 (Family Court) Proceedings. [The Children Act 1989]
Usually, anywhere between 1 to 30 professionals 'gather' to vote (strategy meeting) to determine whether the Parents harm the child (typically single mothers) alleged Fii. The 'factual decision' is often made by a medical professional who is usually biased or has no legal remitted capacity to determine/diagnose Fii. Depending on the secret strategy meeting, the majority of the time, it is off to the Family Court to be found guilty/not guilty of harm or neglect.
Whatever the court decides, children can be removed from parental care or left in the ’harmful’ care of their parents, who then have special orders placed upon their person, preventing them from supporting their children correctly. Often Parents may be coerced/forced into taking the latter to 'reduce trauma', placed upon children" through the process. Medical / health treatment is often removed, with detrimental outcomes.
Doctors who do not know the Children or who have never met them write repurposed reports submitted to the Family Court that 'factually' determine the alleged 'harm' caused by their parents.
Legal teams argue 'facts' and cross-exam experts who have only ever been given ⅛ of the actual bundle of facts. The Judge decides on only the evidence before them. It does not matter if half of the legal bundle contains factually inaccurate falsehoods or if the evidence is entirely missing or criminally altered.
The Paediatrician et al. [NHS], Local Authorities [UK Gov] and Judiciary [UK Gov] - spend hundreds of millions of pounds, pretending to know actual harm from misinterpreted harm. Yet no one professional has unpicked the ‘bundle’ of evidence highlighting truth from fiction. Most of the time, all the evidence is always contained within the bundle, but it’s not forensically pieced together.
The Theory of Fii or the ‘Lie’ or rather professionally speaking, the as-of-yet unfounded unethical diagnosis, can be summarised as follows:
'If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.' By he who shall not be named - based on:
'Never admit a fault or wrong and blame them for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one, and if you repeat it frequently enough, people will sooner or later believe it.'
But look at what the Jewish people achieved. The Truth was finally revealed, and the big lie was drowned in the discriminatory sea of history.
2023 and the rise and rise of Fii continues; whatever happened to Ubuntu, it takes a Village to Raise and Protect a Child.
Parents and Mothers have become empowered to think for themselves and understand their children’s lives more than ever. The Suffragettes fought for women’s rights, yet 100 years on, Mothers are still being accused of caring for their children 'too much'. Motherly instinct should never be dismissed.
Perusing the below graphic (triangle) - What happens if one or all four leading professionals are incorrect? Nothing happens to them as it stands.
STATUTORY & MANDATORY Fii
In the coming months, I will be preparing for and calling for a specific set of ground conditions regarding the exponential rise in Fii, aka Munchausen’s by Proxy / Munchausen’s.
To “diagnose” anyone with the above said, there needs to be 5 x consultant psychiatrists with a minimum of 15 years experience in complex health conditions, 3 x geneticists with a minimum of 10 years experience in DNA / RNA data analysis, and 2 x Forensic Health investigators who have identified and unpicked apart at least three, million-pound taxpayer funded Family Court matters - all of whom, would need to sit on a specialist panel and confer before any mention of Fii is as the 'harm'.
Truth and Trust Reconciliation are needed to remove the Us versus Them barrier and to safeguard and protect children.
Janet Willicott - Forensic Science
Janet started her tri-varied career in mercantile and labour law, then onto education (private tutoring in Europe) and teaching students in (China). After a career in Corporate Eventing (Environment and Public Health) - she read full-time Combined Sciences, focusing on Public Health incorporating Law and Education.
Her primary professional focus is Health (all Health) and how education and law interplay with cross-sector accountability and cross-judiciary disciplines. She focuses on Special Educational Needs and All Disabilities, DME (Double Multiple Exceptionality), ASD, Ethnic Minorities, DV Victims, All LGBTQ+ Communities, Rare Diseases, Genetics, Complex and Perplexing Health Difficulties and Fii (Fabricating and Inducing Illness) / Munchhausen's by Proxy.
Since 2020, Janet has focused on Forensically unpicking Family Court Matters where parents have been wrongly, falsely, or unjustly 'accused' of harming their children as part of her PhD research.
The Chartered Society for Forensic Sciences accepted her Affiliate Membership in January 2022. Janet hopes to establish a brand-new area of Forensic Science (Family Court, Health and Social Care Record-Keeping Analysis.)
UK Citizens are not told of Family Court Matters, as they are (secret courts) and heavily guarded, and any 'spilling the beans' carries a criminal offence and often incarceration. However, hundreds of millions of Pounds Sterling are frivolously wasted on bringing 'unjustly' accused parents (often women/mothers) to court. The taxpayer must learn how much of their tax is wasted on professional incompetence.
Janet has prevented and continues to prevent children from being unjustly removed and argues for their Health to be treated with legal dignity under a duty of care and candour.
The opposite graphic (see triangle image) is Janet's research on why Fii is rising. Fii / Munchhausen's by Proxy is extremely rare, and Fii is but a mere theory with no scientific rigour to support the hypothesis. Forensically unpicking Family Court matter bundles, where Fii has been recorded as a 'danger statement', offers a unique insight into where the safeguarding process has failed.
The failure and incompetence of professionals have caused severe and significant lifelong harm; families are never the same. Often, the wrongfully accused parents commit suicide due to the stressors of injustice.
Janet must Promote and Protect Health in the UK, EU and Worldwide and will publish her research within 18-24 months, after 15 years of unpicking all the 'details' that professionals inadvertently misinterpret.
Time / Language → Complacency = Negligence
Contact - The JUSTICE Initiative
THE JUSTICE INITIATIVE -Forensic Independent Investigations [Normal Like Me Ltd.]
As part of Normal Like Me, The Justice Initiative shares its mission and values to ensure that Legal Health Principles are upheld. Family 'secret' court/child protection cases, where parents believe that they have been wrongfully accused of harming their children, will be forensically investigated, thus laying the grounds for any potential miscarriage of justice. As the UK has a Wide Margin of Appreciation, justice must be afforded to all.
England, United Kingdom
Email only
